This study delves into the intricate landscape of good governance within the realm of land acquisition and compensation processes for road development projects in Nepal, a pertinent issue given the global trend of forced displacement due to infrastructure development. Land acquisition, a process empowering public authorities to acquire land for public projects, often intersects with governance principles. Governance, characterized by participatory decision-making and accountability, ensures equitable distribution of benefits from land and resources. In the context of land acquisition, good governance upholds principles such as transparency, efficiency, and the rule of law. However, challenges persist in actualizing these principles, as evidenced by discrepancies between compensation rates and market values, opaque procedures, and delays in compensation disbursement. Drawing on empirical data from the Kathmandu Terai, Madhesh Fast Track Road Project (KTFTRP), this study reveals shortcomings in governance, including limited participation, lack of transparency, and inefficiency in compensation processes. Findings underscore the need for reforms to align land acquisition practices with principles of good governance, ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and efficiency. This study contributes to the discourse on governance reform and sustainable infrastructure development, offering insights for policymakers and practitioners in Nepal and beyond.
| Published in | Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14 |
| Page(s) | 22-29 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Land Acquisition, Compensation, Good Land Governance, Transparency
| [1] |
Robinson, W. C., Risks and Rights: The Causes, Consequences, and Challenges of Development-Induced Displacement, The Brookings Institution-SAIS Project on Internal Displacement (2003). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/didreport.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [2] |
Cernea, M. M., For a new economics of resettlement: A sociological critique of the compensation principle. International Social Science Journal. (2003), nr 175. [Internet] Available from:
https://cis.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/Cernea_New_Economics-of_Resettlement_ISSJ_2003.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [3] |
IFC. Handbook for preparing a resettlement action plan. Washington, DC, USA: International Finance Corporation (IFC, 2002). [Internet] Available from:
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/492791468153884773/pdf/246740PUB0REPL020020Box12600PUBLIC0.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [4] |
FAO, Land Tenure Studies Nr 10. Compulsory Acquisition of Land and compensation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2008). [Internet] Available from:
https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d16e0900-8b6e-4785-b509-c8b02e748c30/content [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [5] |
ADB, Handbook on Resettlement. A Guide to Good Practice. Manila, Philippines. Asian Development Bank (1998). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.adb.org/documents/handbook-resettlement-guide-good-practice [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [6] |
UNESCAP, what is Good Governance? Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (2012). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [7] |
FAO, Land Tenure Studies Nr 9: Good Governance in Land Tenure and Administration Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2007). [Internet] Available from:
https://catalogue.unccd.int/FAO_Land_Tenure_9_a1179e00.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [8] |
FAO & UN-HABITAT. Land Tenure Working Paper 11: Towards improved land governance: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), United Nations Human Settlements Programme (2009). [Internet] Available from:
https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/download-manager-files/TOWARDS%20IMPROVED%20LAND%20GOVERNANCE%20%2C%20Land%20and%20Tenure%20Working.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [9] | WB & FAO, Good Governance in Land Administration Principles and Good Practices. Washington D. C.: World Bank & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2006). |
| [10] |
FAO. (2012). Voluntary guideline on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in contexts of national food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.fao.org/3/a-i2801e.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [11] |
FIG (2010). International Federation of Surveyors (FIG Publication No.51). Hanoi Declaration Land Acquisition in Emerging Economies. [Internet] Available from:
https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub51/figpub51.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [12] |
Wallace, J. (2010), Land Acquisition in Developing Economies. International Federation of Surveyors, Article of the Month – February (2010). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.fig.net/resources/monthly_articles/2010/february_2010/february_2010_wallace.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [13] |
WB. Involuntary resettlement sourcebook. Planning and implementation in development projects. Washington DC: World Bank (2004). [Internet] Available from:
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/206671468782373680/pdf/301180v110PAPE1ettlement0sourcebook.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [14] |
IFC. Land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. Guidance Note 5: International Finance Corporation (2012). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/2010/2012-ifc-ps-guidance-note-5-en.pdf [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
| [15] |
ORF. Mega Project Development: Issues in Land Acquisition. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. (2010). [Internet] Available from:
https://www.orfonline.org/research/mega-project-development-issues-in-land-acquisition [Accessed 7 May 2024]. |
APA Style
Ansari, S. H., Ghimire, S. (2024). Analysis of Good Governance in Land Acquisition and Compensation for Road Development in Nepal. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 8(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14
ACS Style
Ansari, S. H.; Ghimire, S. Analysis of Good Governance in Land Acquisition and Compensation for Road Development in Nepal. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2024, 8(1), 22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14
AMA Style
Ansari SH, Ghimire S. Analysis of Good Governance in Land Acquisition and Compensation for Road Development in Nepal. Sci Technol Public Policy. 2024;8(1):22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14,
author = {Samsul Haque Ansari and Subash Ghimire},
title = {Analysis of Good Governance in Land Acquisition and Compensation for Road Development in Nepal
},
journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {22-29},
doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20240801.14},
abstract = {This study delves into the intricate landscape of good governance within the realm of land acquisition and compensation processes for road development projects in Nepal, a pertinent issue given the global trend of forced displacement due to infrastructure development. Land acquisition, a process empowering public authorities to acquire land for public projects, often intersects with governance principles. Governance, characterized by participatory decision-making and accountability, ensures equitable distribution of benefits from land and resources. In the context of land acquisition, good governance upholds principles such as transparency, efficiency, and the rule of law. However, challenges persist in actualizing these principles, as evidenced by discrepancies between compensation rates and market values, opaque procedures, and delays in compensation disbursement. Drawing on empirical data from the Kathmandu Terai, Madhesh Fast Track Road Project (KTFTRP), this study reveals shortcomings in governance, including limited participation, lack of transparency, and inefficiency in compensation processes. Findings underscore the need for reforms to align land acquisition practices with principles of good governance, ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and efficiency. This study contributes to the discourse on governance reform and sustainable infrastructure development, offering insights for policymakers and practitioners in Nepal and beyond.
},
year = {2024}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of Good Governance in Land Acquisition and Compensation for Road Development in Nepal AU - Samsul Haque Ansari AU - Subash Ghimire Y1 - 2024/05/24 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14 DO - 10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14 T2 - Science, Technology & Public Policy JF - Science, Technology & Public Policy JO - Science, Technology & Public Policy SP - 22 EP - 29 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4621 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20240801.14 AB - This study delves into the intricate landscape of good governance within the realm of land acquisition and compensation processes for road development projects in Nepal, a pertinent issue given the global trend of forced displacement due to infrastructure development. Land acquisition, a process empowering public authorities to acquire land for public projects, often intersects with governance principles. Governance, characterized by participatory decision-making and accountability, ensures equitable distribution of benefits from land and resources. In the context of land acquisition, good governance upholds principles such as transparency, efficiency, and the rule of law. However, challenges persist in actualizing these principles, as evidenced by discrepancies between compensation rates and market values, opaque procedures, and delays in compensation disbursement. Drawing on empirical data from the Kathmandu Terai, Madhesh Fast Track Road Project (KTFTRP), this study reveals shortcomings in governance, including limited participation, lack of transparency, and inefficiency in compensation processes. Findings underscore the need for reforms to align land acquisition practices with principles of good governance, ensuring fair compensation, transparency, and efficiency. This study contributes to the discourse on governance reform and sustainable infrastructure development, offering insights for policymakers and practitioners in Nepal and beyond. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -
Survey Department, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, School of Engineering, Kathmandu University, Dhulikhel, Nepal
